Mehak Kapur, MacPherson Institute
This article is based on the following research article:
de Bie, A., Marquis, B., Suttie, M., Watkin-McClurg, O., & Woolmer, C. (2020). Orientations to teaching more accessibly in postsecondary education: Mandated, right, pedagogically effective, or profitable? Disability & Society, 37 (5), 849-874 https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1848803
In this article, the authors investigate the factors that influence educators to go beyond the assigned bare minimum (e.g., accessible education training) to make their teaching practices more accessible. Using a qualitative methodology, the researchers outline five orientations (or reasons) of accessibility that inform educators’ practice of accessible teaching. These reasons include 1) mandate, 2) right, 3) pedagogically effective, 4) nice, and/or 5) profitable. The researchers discuss the importance and implications of orientations in practicing accessible teaching.
The study conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews with 27 teaching assistants and instructors here at McMaster University. These were audio recorded and transcribed for coding and analysis. The researchers selected the ‘values and orientations’ factor since these explicitly articulated the motivations and implied understandings of the participants about accessibility.
These reasons to advance accessibility are:
Educators should be aware of the values and reasons that underlie accessible teaching practices for the following reasons:
How can you minimize inaccessible consequences of orientations?
Updates
Spotlight on SOTL