“Normally, I am nervous to speak with my classmates, and I always miss opportunities to participate in discussions when we are working on an assignment. Furthermore, I need to read the text twice or three times to understand it; this makes me feel embarrassed … it also inhibits me from having a conversation with others.” – Seina Yamada, current undergraduate student
To start, Esther Zhang, a former international student, reflects on her experience in lectures in the video below.
To foster the success of ELLs, there are a few things for educators to keep in mind at the beginning of a course:
Many international ELLs are more familiar with a passive style of education, in which students sit quietly and receive information from educators. Active learning and participation might be new for many ELLs, so take time to explain what it is, what it looks like, what its benefits are, and what expectations are for the classroom. Modelling the desired behaviour for class is helpful for students that have never been a participant in an active learning classroom before.
Provide students with examples of what they should and should not email you about throughout the term. Some ELLs are from education systems where students must email their professors about private matters (e.g., health issues, personal issues) if they miss class or an assignment deadline.
Below are some strategies to use in the classroom to support ELLs in following lessons, achieving objectives, and learning successfully.
Avoid using overly academic or advanced vocabulary and jargon when simple language will suffice. Use language, both spoken and written, that is easy to understand, clear, and concise. In terms of written communication, avoid writing a paragraph when an idea or instruction can be communicated in a sentence or two. In terms of speaking, moderate the speed of your speech, but keep your speaking natural. Repeat key messages to help with understanding and retention.
Check on an on-going basis that learners have understood lectures, readings, and general materials. This can be done by building in frequent formative assessments such as exit slips and ungraded quizzes to monitor student progress.
As much as possible, make materials available before classes so that learners can review materials and prepare for lectures. This will make listening to and participating in classes easier for ELLs. Also, consider the vocabulary that learners are required to know or use to access lessons and assignments. Pre-teach difficult or new vocabulary so that students are familiar with it when it comes up in classes. Create a course glossary on Avenue to Learn.
Importantly, elicit feedback and suggestions from students. Ask students about their learning preferences and incorporate activities and options that support them. A great way to get feedback from learners is to do a Stop/Start/Continue activity halfway through the semester. Be open to these comments and modify instructional strategies accordingly.
Designing clear and accessible assessments is important for ELLs. Below are a few strategies to make sure that assessments consider the language and learning needs of ELLs.
When writing assignments, consider the language used to give instructions. Make sure that instructions are sufficiently detailed so that learners have all the information needed to complete the task without needing to seek clarification, but avoid wordiness or excessive detail, which can be overwhelming or confusing for ELLs. If possible, use numbered lists to give instructions and write direct statements.
When appropriate, provide example assignments so that students clearly understand the expectations of an assignment. Examples are an excellent teaching resource and can help learners feel confident that they are completing work correctly.
Understandings of academic integrity differ across cultures, and ELLs may not be familiar with Canadian expectations. Therefore, take time to discuss plagiarism, provide students with appropriate resources and supports, and explicitly teach about citation conventions and expectations.
Consider the degree to which language should be assessed when marking written work. While it is important to encourage students to submit high-quality work, balance a student’s ability to demonstrate achievement of learning outcomes with their language use.
Consider Universal Design for Learning and design assessments and assignments that allow students to represent their learning in a variety of ways. For example, if the task is to submit a summary of a chapter to demonstrate comprehension, consider allowing students to submit the summary in written form or as an audio/video recording.
Take time regularly to reflect on how successfully students completed assignments. If many students performed poorly, review the assignment for clarity and make sure that tasks appropriately and fairly challenge students.
Below are some strategies to keep in mind when designing exams for ELLs:
If your exam contains long passages of text, be sure to give students enough time to read it. There are surprising differences between L1 (English is the first language) and L2 (English is an additional language) reading rates which should be considered when designing and administering exams.
Led by Dr. Anna Moro and Dr. Daniel Schmidtke, the MELD Research Team at McMaster focuses on how ELLs learn English. The MELD Research Lab is one of the only research labs affiliated with an English-language bridging program. The MELD Research Lab uses eye-tracking technology to study reading rates in ELL students.
A note from Dr. Daniel Schmitdke:
Eye-tracking technology provides arguably the most accurate record of naturalistic reading behaviour. Studies conducted by the MELD Research Lab estimate that ELLs read at a speed of 115 words per minute (wpm) on average by the end of the MELD bridging program (Schmidtke et al., submitted). Though EALs make gains during the bridging program, their estimated reading speed, upon entry to undergraduate studies, falls short of the estimated 238 wpm average for a native English speaker reading a non-fiction text (Brysbaert, 2019). This places ELLs at a disadvantage in learning and examination scenarios where students are expected to cover and understand large amounts of text. Consider that a native English speaker can read approximately 125 more words per minute than a non-native speaker. These estimates indicate that compared to native English speakers, ELLs would cover 15,000 fewer words during a two-hour study period, 7,500 fewer words in a one-hour examination, or 60 fewer words in the 30 seconds that a slide is shown during a lecture.
Test your knowledge by trying the True or False quiz below.