Welcome to our Online Module on Collecting Feedback on Your Teaching!
In this module, we’ll explore the key aspects of gathering student feedback on your teaching. We’ll cover what feedback to collect, why it matters, and the best timing for obtaining it. You’ll also learn about the differences between formative and summative feedback, including the pros and cons of collecting feedback at both mid-term and end-of-term points.
Next, we’ll delve into the logistics of gathering student feedback, examining the strengths and weaknesses of both in-person and online methods. We’ll provide practical steps and strategies to streamline the feedback process, making it more effective and efficient. You’ll also gain access to resources, templates, and tips for crafting strong survey questions that align with your teaching goals and course learning outcomes.
Finally, you’ll have the opportunity to create your own mid-term formative feedback survey. You’ll develop a plan for administering the survey, analyzing the data, and reflecting on the feedback collected to enhance your teaching practice. This module will also provide you with some alternative feedback collection techniques if a survey is not appropriate for your needs.
By the end of this module, you should be able to:
To begin, we’ll examine the differences between formative and summative feedback. We’ll also discuss key reasons why instructors might choose to gather student feedback, the optimal timing for doing so, and the potential benefits and challenges involved.
Before proceeding with the workshop, take a few minutes to reflect on the following questions.
Consider these questions both broadly and in the context of your own teaching practice. Log your thoughts and ideas in the Reflection Activity Worksheet. As you progress through this module, think about how your reflections align with or differ from the strategies and evidence presented.
Next, watch the following video, which discusses different types of feedback, the reasons and best times for collecting it, and evidence-based considerations for effective feedback gathering.
Video Transcript
Video PowerPoint
In this section, we will review the step-by-step process for collecting formative mid-term feedback from students.
Before diving into the process of collecting feedback, take a moment to reflect on why you want to gather feedback on your teaching. Consider what specific aspects of your course you are most interested in learning about. Are you looking to understand student engagement, the clarity of your instructional materials, or the effectiveness of your teaching methods?
To support this reflection process, use the Reflection Activity Worksheet to help identify your goals and the specific areas of your teaching or course where feedback would be most valuable. If you have already started working on this document, consider adding in more ideas, thoughts, and reflections using these additional prompts as you work through this first step:
By taking the time to thoughtfully reflect on your goals for feedback collection, you’ll be better positioned to ask meaningful questions that provide actionable insights for enhancing your teaching practice and supporting student learning.
Midway through your course, you might consider collecting feedback from students, typically achieved by creating and distributing a survey. Whether you administer this survey in person or online, it’s strongly recommended that the responses remain anonymous to encourage honest and constructive feedback.
Your survey can include a selection of quantitative (e.g., rating scales) and qualitative (e.g., open-ended) questions. At a minimum, an effective formative mid-term survey should ask students the following key questions:
You can customize these core questions and add others based on the specific areas of feedback you want to explore, which may be aligned with your own goals and reflections. For example, you might include questions that focus on certain pedagogical strategies, course materials, or aspects of student engagement.
Aim to limit your survey to 3-12 questions in total. This length is typically sufficient to collect meaningful feedback while avoiding survey fatigue. The number of questions and data you collect may also be influenced by the size of your class. Later in this section, you’ll find recommendations for designing questions tailored to different class sizes.
To help select your survey questions, consult the Mid-Term Formative Feedback Survey Template and Sample Questions resource. Feel free to highlight questions you would like to use and/or create different types of questions using this template, focusing on the specific feedback you wish to gather.
By thoughtfully designing your survey questions, you will gather valuable, actionable feedback that can help you enhance the course and better support student learning.
You can choose to collect student feedback either in person or online, using handwritten responses or digital survey tools such as Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, or Mentimeter. Each method has its own benefits and drawbacks, which may influence your choice of approach, survey design, and administration plan.
Administering feedback surveys in person can offer several advantages:
If you prefer, you can also provide time during an in-person class for students to complete an online survey. This hybrid approach maintains the benefits of in-person administration while allowing for digital, anonymous responses that are easy to download and analyze.
Online surveys offer distinct benefits:
By carefully considering the advantages and limitations of each method, you can choose the approach that best fits your goals and context. Whichever method you select, be sure to communicate the process clearly to your students and provide any necessary support to facilitate their participation.
After designing your survey and deciding how it will be administered, the next step is to prepare your students for the feedback process. Taking the time to explain the purpose and importance of the survey can increase student buy-in and lead to higher participation and completion rates.
Before or on the day you plan to collect feedback, take a few moments during class to introduce the exercise:
After collecting your students’ feedback, take a few days to read through and thoughtfully consider their comments. Give yourself the time and space needed to reflect on the feedback you have gathered, as this can be a personal and sometimes emotional process.
Focus on identifying recurring themes and patterns in the responses and try to pinpoint 2-3 key takeaways for both areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. Be sure to recognize and appreciate the positive feedback as well, rather than focusing solely on critical comments.
Once you’ve had time to reflect, decide how you will address the feedback students have shared. Consider what changes you can make in the current term and what adjustments might need to be saved for future iterations of the course. It’s important to acknowledge the feedback with your students and communicate the changes you plan to implement. If certain changes aren’t feasible, be transparent and explain why these adjustments aren’t possible at this time. You might also highlight how their feedback will inform future versions of the course.
If you need additional support in processing the feedback or deciding how to respond, consider discussing it with a trusted colleague, supervisor, or an Educational Developer at your institution’s teaching and learning center. These conversations can help provide new perspectives and ideas for moving forward.
While student evaluations of teaching (SETs) are a widely used tool for gathering feedback, they have several limitations that educators should keep in mind. Research has shown that SETs may not always accurately reflect teaching quality or student learning outcomes (Boring, Ottoboni, & Stark, 2016). One key issue is the presence of bias in student responses. Studies indicate that factors such as the instructor’s gender, race, age, and perceived personality can influence student ratings, often leading to lower scores for women, instructors of color, and those who do not conform to stereotypical expectations (Spooren, Brockx, & Mortelmans, 2013).
Moreover, students may sometimes base their evaluations on factors unrelated to teaching effectiveness, such as the perceived difficulty of the course or the grades they expect to receive (Galbraith, Merrill, & Kline, 2012). As a result, student evaluations of teaching should be interpreted with caution and supplemented with other forms of feedback, such as peer observations or self-reflective practices (Uijtdehaage, S., & O’Neal).
Another significant limitation of student feedback is its focus on immediate perceptions rather than long-term learning. Students may not be the best judges of what teaching practices contribute to deep, lasting learning, as they might prefer engaging or entertaining teaching styles over approaches that are more rigorous but ultimately lead to better learning outcomes (Uttl, White, & Gonzalez, 2017).
Additionally, when students provide feedback mid-term, they may not have a complete understanding of how different components of the course fit together, or how particular teaching methods will benefit their learning in the long run. For this reason, it is essential for instructors to interpret student feedback within the broader context of their teaching goals and pedagogical strategies, using it as one of several data points in evaluating their teaching practice and evidencing teaching effectiveness.
Within 1-2 weeks of collecting feedback, follow up with your class to express appreciation for their insights and participation. Taking the time to acknowledge their input demonstrates that you value their perspectives and are committed to using their feedback to enhance the course.
By debriefing with your students, you close the feedback loop and build a stronger learning community. This process helps reinforce the value of student input and encourages continued engagement throughout the remainder of the course.
If designing and administering a survey is not appropriate for your needs, you may choose to modify the process by exploring some alternative techniques for collecting student feedback on your teaching.
Please review the Additional Techniques for Collecting Student Feedback resource for some ideas!
The context of the class size can significantly influence the design and administration of a mid-term formative feedback survey or collection technique. Here are tailored recommendations for both small and large classes to help you gather meaningful insights while accounting for the unique dynamics of each setting.
In a smaller class, you have the opportunity to ask more open-ended questions, as you’ll receive fewer responses to review. This allows you to gather richer, more detailed feedback about students’ experiences, specific teaching methods, and areas for improvement. For example:
In small classes, it can be effective to collect feedback through a structured class discussion or a focus group rather than a formal survey. This allows students to share their thoughts in real time and engage in a dialogue about the course. You can use a technique like “Stop, Start, Continue” and ask students to provide input verbally or through a shared document. Be sure to create a safe, open environment where students feel comfortable sharing honest feedback. Please review the Additional Techniques for Collecting Student Feedback resource for more information on these strategies.
In large classes, it can be challenging to review and analyze a high volume of open-ended responses. To streamline the process, include more quantitative (scaled) questions that provide quick, aggregated insights. For instance, use a Likert scale (1-5) for questions like:
This approach allows you to quickly identify patterns and common areas of concern without getting overwhelmed by the volume of feedback.
Since a lengthy survey may deter students in a large class from participating and provide an overwhelming amount of data for you to review, focus on gathering feedback about the most critical aspects of the course. Limit the survey to a select set of well-chosen questions that address core areas like course content, teaching effectiveness, and student engagement.
In larger classes, use digital tools like Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, or Mentimeter to administer a survey. These tools can handle many responses and automatically compile data, making it easier to identify trends.
While student evaluations of teaching (SETs) have limitations, gathering evidence that reflects the student experience, demonstrates instructional effectiveness, and highlights an educator’s strengths remains essential. Such evidence is often required for job applications, promotions, tenure reviews, or teaching awards.
Formative mid-term feedback collected directly from students offers a valuable opportunity to showcase teaching innovation and effectiveness. Integrated into a teaching portfolio, this feedback enables educators to reflect on their teaching practices, illustrating how student insights have shaped their professional growth, instructional strategies, and the design of courses or programs.
Moreover, mid-term feedback provides an actionable pathway to improve summative evaluations. By gathering student input at the midpoint of a course, instructors can make timely adjustments that enhance both the learning experience and the outcomes reflected in final evaluations.
Ultimately, incorporating and interpreting student feedback is a key component of a holistic approach to evaluating and demonstrating teaching effectiveness. By treating student feedback as one of multiple data points, educators can gain deeper insights into their impact on student learning, foster continuous improvement, and build stronger connections between their teaching practices and student success.
Now that you’ve explored the value of collecting student feedback, reviewed the process, and learned about different strategies and tools, it’s time to start drafting your own feedback survey. Let’s create a student-friendly midterm formative feedback survey that you can easily adapt for your class. You can build your survey using tools like Google Forms, Microsoft Forms, or your institution’s Learning Management System (LMS). Aim to include a mix of open-ended questions for detailed insights and scaled questions for quick, quantitative feedback.
Set aside 20-30 minutes for this activity.
Begin by reviewing your Reflection Activity Worksheet and the Mid-Term Formative Feedback Survey Template and Sample Questions. Recall the steps and recommendations outlined in the module and think about which questions would best suit your teaching context and goals. You can also search online or use Generative AI tools to help brainstorm additional survey questions. Feel free to customize and modify the questions to align with your specific needs.
Recall: Keep in mind that the more questions you include, the longer it will take for students to complete the survey, and the more time it will take for you to review the responses. Aim to keep your survey between 3-12 questions. If you find your list is getting too long, consider whether any questions may elicit similar answers and focus on the most critical areas where you need feedback. For example:
Next, create your survey using either a word processing tool or an online form platform (e.g., Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, Mentimeter, or even a paper-based option). Be sure to set your survey settings to collect responses anonymously, as this often leads to more honest and constructive feedback from students.
Survey Templates: Ready to Use!
The following two survey templates, created with Microsoft Forms, are available to you to duplicate, modify, and implement in your courses.
One template is recommended for small classes (https://tinyurl.com/MSFSmall) and the other is an option for larger classes (https://tinyurl.com/MSF-Large).
Feel free to adapt and make use of these as you see fit! Or you can create your own survey from scratch and input your selected questions.
Consider the logistical elements of administering your survey. Reflect on the following questions as you finalize your approach:
Remember, you can use the Template – Slides for Feedback Debrief with Students to help guide your discussion with the class 1-2 weeks after collecting feedback.
In this module, you explored when and why to collect feedback on your teaching, examined the challenges and benefits of gathering mid-term student feedback both in person and online, and reviewed the key steps involved in the feedback process. Additionally, you began designing your own feedback survey, developed a plan to administer it to your students, and outlined a strategy to collect, reflect on, and act upon the feedback. You also considered how to effectively debrief with students, sharing what you learned and communicating any changes you plan to make to the course or your instructional approach.
As noted at the beginning of this module, by the end of the module you should be able to:
After completing this module, we also encourage you to:
Thank you for completing this online module on collecting feedback on your teaching! We hope it has helped you recognize the value of gathering student feedback and equipped you with a variety of techniques to add to your teaching toolkit. Ideally, you now have a draft survey ready to implement in one of your courses.
Reflecting on and discussing student feedback can be an enriching experience. With time and practice, integrating feedback into your teaching can become a natural and rewarding part of your professional growth as an educator.
Best of luck as you continue to enhance your teaching practice!
Congratulations on completing a module in the MacPherson Institute Learning Catalogue!
We hope you found the experience meaningful and relevant to your teaching and learning practice. As part of our ongoing effort to improve and grow the Learning Catalogue, we invite you to take just a few minutes to complete a short reflection form.
We know your time is valuable, and we deeply appreciate your willingness to share your thoughts.
Abbott, R. D., Wulff, D. H., & Szego, C. K. (1990). Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction: The student perspective. *Journal of Educational Psychology, 82*(2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.201
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers.
Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Stark, P. B. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen Research. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1
Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976252
Diamond, R. M. (2004). Preparing for promotion, tenure, and annual review: A faculty guide. Anker Publishing.
Finelli, C. J., Pinder-Grover, T., & Wright, M. C. (2011). Consultations on teaching: Using student feedback for instructional improvement. To Improve the Academy, 29(1), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2011.tb00664.x
Freishtat, R. (2016). The utility of student evaluations of teaching. Berkeley Center for Teaching & Learning. https://teaching.berkeley.edu/news/utility-student-evaluations-teaching
Galbraith, C. S., Merrill, G. B., & Kline, D. M. (2012). Are student evaluations of teaching effectiveness valid for measuring student learning outcomes in business-related classes? A meta-analysis and empirical study. Research in Higher Education, 53(4), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9249-2
Golding, C., & Adam, L. (2016). Evaluate to improve: Useful approaches to student evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.976810
Hendry, G. D., & Dean, S. J. (2002). Accountability, evaluation of teaching and expertise in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440210156493
Hunt, L. (2003). Encouraging student evaluations of teaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103807
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009294
Knol, M. H., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Kooloos, J. G. M. (2013). The effects of a midterm evaluation of teaching on student satisfaction and learning in a problem-based learning curriculum: A quasi-experimental study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(5), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9415-7
Kulik, J. A. (2001). Student ratings: Validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(109), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.1
Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. Mainstreaming Digest, 109–113.
Mosteller, F. (1989). The “Muddiest Point in the Lecture” as a feedback device. On Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 10–21.
Penny, A. R. (2003). Changing the agenda for research into students’ views about university teaching: Four shortcomings of SRT research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510309396
Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
Springgay, S., & Clarke, A. (2007). Learning to teach: A body becoming curriculum. Peter Lang.
Stead, D. R. (2005). A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(2), 118–131.
Taylor, C., MacKinnon, M., & Pitre, N. (2020). Student feedback: An untapped resource for quality teaching in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5), 1–17.
Taylor, R. L., Knorr, K., Ogrodnik, M., & Sinclair, P. (2020). Seven principles for good practice in midterm student feedback. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(4), 322–336.DOI 10.1080/1360144x.2020.1762086
Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
Veeck, A., O’Reilly, K., MacMillan, A., & Yu, H. (2016). The use of collaborative midterm student evaluations to provide actionable results. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316661864